Beware: Test-Prep Coaching an Expensive Way to Produce Very Small Gains
There is clear evidence that familiarity with the types of questions asked on tests like the SAT and the ACT will help students perform better on these important exams. The idea that scores can be improved has led to an entire industry that features various test-prep standardized test coaching models.
However, there is mounting evidence that these extremely expensive test-prep coaching programs do very little for students despite marketing claims to the contrary. A new report by the National Association for College Admission Counseling found that the costly coaching of test-prep firms boosted average SAT scores by a mere 30 points combined on the verbal and math sections (1600 possible) and but one point on the ACT (36 possible points).
Such numbers pale against the claims from these firms that coaching can help students improve by hundreds of points on the SAT or as much as five points on the ACT. When all is said and done, it appears that the gains students make after these expensive coaching sessions (more than a $1,000 per program), on average, could have been obtained in a more cost-effective manner.
Some Shady Doings Alleged
According to critics, some test-prep firms attempt to inflate their impact by giving students mock tests that are actually harder than the true exams. When students take those harder, sample tests, they obtain lower scores than normal. Later, when they take the real test, the students obtain much higher scores, a result that leads these test-prep firms to claim they have significantly helped students.
One such example is cited by John Hechinger writing for The Wall Street Journal. The article tells the tale of Jonah Varon, a straight-A student at Lowell High School in San Francisco, who theoretically scored 2060 out of a possible 2400 on a mock test by one coaching company, Revolution Prep, but later scored a perfect 2400, 340 points higher, on the real test.
Hechinger notes that Revolution Prep offers students a “score improvement guarantee.” The firm stipulates students will improve SAT test results by 200 points – the caveat, students who do not obtain a 200 point or more gain are not given their money back. Instead, they get to take the course a second time for free.
Varon gathered test scores from 15 classmates who apparently had very similar experiences then wrote an article for his school newspaper. Varon contended that either the mock test was scored more harshly or the exam was simply harder than a typical exam.
He concluded: “It seems like dishonest advertising.”
Colleges Feed into the Test-Prep Frenzy
Unfortunately, one key issue fueling the test-prep industry is the number of colleges that continue to place great emphasis on standardized test results and in particular see a 30 point difference among students as significantly relevant. Simply stated, at some schools, even the smallest of gains can be critical in the admissions process.
The report notes that colleges essentially promote SAT-prep courses whenever they establish a baseline score. The report also notes that many schools indicate that the thirty point difference could in fact be the catalyst for that student to be admitted.
So while it seems inconceivable that it would be worth it to spend thousands of dollars only to see a student’s combined math and verbal results go from 1110 to 1140, on the more selective side, the difference from 1310 to 1340 could matter, at least at some schools.
Try a Cost-Effective Approach First
If it just so happens that money is no object for you, utilizing one of these test-prep firms certainly would help you gain familiarity with the format of these exams and the type of questions that would be asked. However, familiarity can be gained in a number of other ways at costs much less than the $1,000 coaching course or the $100 per hour private tutorial sessions offered by these test-prep firms.
In talking with Hechinger, College Board senior vice president Laurence Bunin acknowledged that “familiarity with the SAT tends to provide the biggest short-term gains for students.” He of course recommended the materials provided by the College Board including their $20 study guide.
Other options do exist, each at a fraction of the price of the private test-prep tutorials. Unless money is truly no object, students owe it to themselves and their families to consider the most reasonable options.
However, that dissatisfaction, according to NPD, comes primarily from a lack of understanding by the purchaser as to what the capabilities of a netbook are.
With a netbook you have to give up playing CDs and DVDs and generally have to accept an older version of Ethernet/Wi-Fi that is functional but not quite as fast. Essentially, netbooks can be thought of as last year’s technology – instead of being cutting edge the intent is to perform using old staples, the proverbial computing that is not necessarily the best but is in fact good enough for most applications.
While netbooks are very inexpensive, the last thing any of us need is another electronic device we do not use. Therefore, it is critical that purchasers understand the rationale behind the creation of the netbook and the stated purpose of these portable computers.
With online programming, you can do your coursework in your pajamas at virtually any time of the day. Depending on those work or family commitments, you can do your studies in the early morning or late at night or entirely on the weekend.
In simplest terms, the hybrid option is a great step in convenience when compared to the traditional method of taking courses on campus. But these programs are nowhere near as flexible as an option that can be completed entirely online over the Internet from some distant location.
One last, additional consideration is the cost of the program. The first thing that students must realize is there are often higher costs associated with online programming. In other words, that convenience and flexibility generally cost money.
Especially when the person found himself banned from attending the class he had already shelled out big bucks to attend.
Today, officials caution students to contrast this publication with other literature that examines their respective college of interest. To get a sense as to why the US News ratings should not be considered the be-all and end-all, we turn to a recent incident involving a
According to
Regardless of the hoopla and whether or not Clemson specifically sought to game the system, the revelations of Watt appear to match those of others who insist that the ratings can be manipulated.
The consensus is that within the first five minutes the interviewer or the committee conducting the interview will form their impression of you. If it is negative, the remainder of the interview will be immaterial – simply stated it is nigh-near impossible to change a poor first impression.
The key is to project an air that you can overcome that feeling. The ability to conquer one’s fears is considered one of the most positive traits a person can have.
While you must set the tone early, it is also important to understand that others will do so as well. Those who are able to control their nervousness and project their basic level of confidence throughout the interview stand the best chance.